Showing posts with label Congressman John Lewis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congressman John Lewis. Show all posts

Monday, January 21, 2019

Building the Beloved Community: Bishop Michael Curry's Reflections on Dr. King


Dr. King with his children Yolanda & Martin Luther III
at the World's Fair August 12, 1964
Given the enormous weight of his legacy, the lasting impact of his work and the nature of his violent death in 1968, I'm not sure it's appropriate to wish someone a "Happy" Martin Luther King, Jr. Day on such a solemn occasion.

Clearly it's more important than ever to recognize, honor and celebrate Dr. King's life, and even though my office was open today and I had to work (they say real estate never sleeps), I was fortunate enough to be able to hear some uplifting words of hope and inspiration on The Brian Lehrer Show earlier this morning.

The words were recorded at WNYC's 13th Annual Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day celebration held Sunday afternoon at the Apollo Theater in Harlem.

The event, co-hosted by Brian Lehrer and All Things Considered host Jami Floyd, focused on the contributions of lesser known figures who played essential roles in the Civil Rights movement.

It featured panelists and speakers including NAACP board member Dr. Hazel Dukes and renowned photographer and author Chester Higgins, Jr.

One of the highlights of the event was a moving reflection on the spiritual meaning of Dr. King's legacy by Bishop Michael Curry, the presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church and the first African-American to hold the office.

Now you may recall Bishop Curry as the speaker who managed to upstage the spectacle of the royal wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle back in May with a charismatic sermon on the power of love that stole the show (and raised royal eyebrows by stretching the ceremony a full eight minutes over the slotted time...) definitely worth a watch if you didn't see it.

Bishop Michael Curry delivering the royal sermon
Watch Prince Charles' wife Camilla Parker Bowles (whose affair with His Royal Highness famously wrecked his marriage to Princess Diana...) squirm and shoot sideways glances at Prince William's wife Kate Middleton as the Bishop really gets into it...worth it.

This past Sunday at the MLK Day celebration at the Apollo, Bishop Curry brought that same powerful mix of spirituality, charisma, wisdom and humor with remarks that left me laughing out loud in my office.

So for those of you who appreciate good oratory, and want to hear a genuinely funny, insightful and moving reflection on the love that lies at the root of Dr. King's mission, take a few minutes to sit down and click this link and listen to the opening of this segment from the Brian Lehrer Show earlier this morning.

When the page opens just click the blue arrow - the whole segment is 50 minutes, but Brian opens with a quick introduction and then quickly plays the lengthy excerpt of Bishop Curry's comments that are both powerful and funny - so he gets right into the clip.

Far more intelligent, learned and capable people than I have spent much of today discussing King's legacy on radio, TV and in person, but I'm not sure any of them get to the heart of Dr King's teachings more effectively than Bishop Curry does.

Again, I'm not one to wish someone a "happy" MLK Day, but Bishop Curry's remarks left me with a sense of joy on a solemn occasion at a time in our nation's history when Dr. King's message is more important than ever - and still resonates.

And I think it's important not to confuse that message in the way VP Mike Pence did on Sunday when he had the gall to use one of Dr. King's quotes to justify Trump's senseless wall of hatred.

As Georgia Democratic Congressman John Lewis observed earlier today of Dr. King:

 "We honor his legacy by celebrating this holiday as a day on, not a day off. It is a day of action, a day of love, to give of ourselves to others and begin anew the building of the beloved community." 

A community where all are welcome, and there are no walls.

Sunday, July 08, 2018

Not That Long Ago Is Now

17-year-old Rep. John Lewis being arrested in 1957
for using a segregated bathroom in Mississippi
As Georgia Democratic Congressman John Lewis observed on his Twitter feed on Saturday morning:

"57 years ago today I was released from Mississippi State Penitentiary, better known as Parchman, after being arrested in the Jackson, MS bus station for using a so-called 'white' restroom during the Freedom Rides."

That was just one of many encounters with police that the 78-year-old Civil rights icon has had over the course of his position as a leader of the Civil Rights movement in America.

It's hard to believe that some state laws still barred African-American citizens from using public restrooms just thirteen years after the United States and the Allies defeated the authoritarian Axis powers of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and Fascist Italy in World War II.

But given the current state of the Republican Party under the current leadership of Donald Trump, barring black folks from using public toilets or water fountains (or voting) because of the color of their skin doesn't seem like some kind of snapshot from ancient history.

On February 19, 1942, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 which authorized the federal government to forcibly remove tens of thousands of American citizens of Japanese descent from their homes, farms and businesses and relocate them to remote concentration camps where they were interned for the duration of WWII.

As Jonathan Katz observed in an article for Slate.com back in June, these days writers, journalists and citizens debate whether it's appropriate to call the hastily-constructed detention facilities built to house separated immigrant families incarcerated by the Trump administration, concentration camps.

Whatever name you choose to give to those facilities spread across the United States, they were created by an executive order signed by Trump.

Despite his childish attempts to blame Congressional Democrats in the wake of global condemnation for his actions.

Japanese-Americans stand at the barbwire fence of
Manzanar under the gaze of a guard tower in WWII
Last year Democratic California Governor Jerry Brown signed the Civil Liberties Public Education Act which authorized $3 million in state funds to educate citizens on the internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII.

As Al Muratsuchi, the California State Assembly member who sponsored the bill observed:

"We have to remember that the incarceration of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans without any due process of law began with an executive order, much like the ones that President Trump has been issuing." 

As 86-year-old Mas Okui told New York Times reporter Inyoung Kang, the former Los Angeles school teacher returns to the remote California desert each year where he and his family were held in the Manzanar internment camp during WWII.

"The only way to teach kids about this is to teach the teachers about what happened to us. I felt it was incumbent on me, and I'll do it as long as I can."

As Kang reported, Okui leads workshop tours of Manzanar to educate younger school teachers on the importance of remembering how the U.S. government incarcerated innocent American citizens because of their nationality and racist hostility to non-whites that was so widespread on the west coast after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.

Considering that the Trump administration has ordered children as young as three-years-old shipped off to detention facilities hundreds, even thousands of miles from their parents, the internment of Japanese-Americans 76 years ago isn't some kind of distant past.

In fact, given a slew of troubling incidents across the U.S. that have made media headlines recently, it's pretty clear that the so-called "land of freedom" is still populated with conservatives who advocate a society segregated on the basis of race, ethnicity, nationality and religion.

Glenridge residents Adam Bloom & Jasmine Edwards 
Just a day before I posted my previous blog about a woman in a suburb of Cleveland, Ohio who called the police on a 12-year-old black boy for accidentally pushing a lawnmower over a small section of her lawn, a man in Winston-Salem, North Carolina called the police on an African-American woman.

Why?

For using the private swimming pool in the community where she owns a home worth over a half million dollars.

Only Wednesday July 4th, as millions of Americans celebrated the nation's independence, Jasmine Edwards (or Jazmine Abhulimen as she's also known) did what many people did on Wednesday; she went to the pool with her son.

But Adam Bloom (pictured above), the self-described "pool chair" for the Glenridge community pool was instantly suspicious.

Now the Glenridge Community Website clearly states that "our pool and playground area provide a relaxing environment for our homeowners and children".

But "ID Adam" took it upon himself to question Edwards' residency and demanded that she show him proof that she lived there - even after she'd already told him that she was a member of the community and entitled to use the pool.

Rather than simply apologize for his mistake, Bloom pushed the issue and called the cops, ostensibly based on his unjustified personal suspicions that Edwards and her son were trespassing on private property.

If you watch the cellphone video that Edwards took of the confrontation with Bloom outside the gate of the pool on Wednesday, she makes the observation to both him and the two police officers that the sign outside the pool does not state that residents must show ID to use the pool facilities.

She also notes that Bloom, who comes off as a smug twit in the video, did not ask any of the white residents at the pool for their ID's, or question whether they were residents of Glenridge.

He only approached Edwards and her son, the only residents of color.

A photo of the Glenridge Community pool 
Overall, Officer Aaron Lazusky, one of the two police officers seen in the video was respectful and seemed to handle the situation pretty well in an effort to try and resolve the situation.

Lazusky politely asks Edwards for her pool card, swipes it to see that it opens the door and tells Bloom that should be sufficient proof that she's entitled to use the pool.

The officer also makes it a point to apologize to Edwards, which is more than can be said of Bloom - who simply walks away when she asks him if he plans to apologize to her.

Bloom only managed an attempt an apology after his (now) former employer, Sonoco Paper Products Co. quickly fired his ass after social media began ID'ing him as a company employee.

Sonoco also released a statement stating (in part) that Bloom's actions: "does not reflect the core values of our Company, and the employee involved is no longer employed by the Company in any respect. Our core values at Sonoco are built on dignity and respect for all, and we do not condone discrimination of any kind, inside or outside of the workplace." 

Now in my view, these recent incidents of white people calling the police on black people doing normal everyday stuff is evidence that the same kind of institutionalized racism that prompted Georgia Democratic Congressman John Lewis to be arrested for using a segregated bathroom back in 1957, is still very much alive in 21st century America.

These incidents are also a reflection of how the Trump administration has eroded civil discourse in this country by actively cultivating a tone of divisiveness based on race, ethnicity, nationality and religion.

Classic hallmarks of the kind of repressive authoritarian rule that the U.S. fought to end in WWII. 

Separated immigrant kids in 21st century America
In any organization leadership starts at the top, and it also sets the tone.

And there's no ambiguity about the kind of tone set by the Trump administration.

Including banning Muslims from some countries from entering the U.S. and separating and incarcerating the Hispanic children of asylum seekers and undocumented immigrants.


Those kinds of policies have sent the not-so-subtle signal to the "Pool Patrol Paula's" and Adam Blooms of the world that it's okay to view people of color with suspicion, contempt and open hostility.

These incidents, where white people have called the police because law-abiding African-Americans are waiting in coffee shops, barbecuing in public parks where it's legal to do so, mowing a lawn or using a community pool, are in effect, attempts to criminalize African-Americans for being black.

From a purely political standpoint, it's remarkable to watch the Republican leadership in Washington shirk from using the powers of the Legislative Branch of the federal government granted to them by the Constitution to check Trump's authority.

Or publicly push back against reprehensible policies they privately agree are wrong.

Aside from the occasional tepid lip service, most Republican leaders in Congress have essentially rolled over and allowed Trump's repugnant views to define the GOP as a party.

Allowing some individuals to bring fringe, extremist views into the mainstream under the protection of the Republican umbrella.

For example, just consider some of the candidates around the country running for Congress on the Republican ticket.

An actual campaign poster for US
Senate candidate Patrick Little 
Back in March I blogged about Arthur Jones, the Trump-supporting former head of the American Nazi Party (really) who's running as a Republican for the Illinois 3rd District Congressional seat.

On Thursday CNN's Marc Rod reported that Republican Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner publicly urged Republican voters to cast votes for "anyone but" the Holocaust-denying Jones in the upcoming mid-term elections in November.

Even the right-leaning Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz exhorted voters in the Illinois 3rd to vote for Democratic incumbent Dan Lipinski.

Out in California there's Senate candidate Patrick Little.

As Luis Gomez reported for the San Diego Union-Tribune back in May, the California Republican Party moved to kick Little out of it's convention in a desperate effort to distance the GOP from his anti-Semitic views.


This guy is an unapologetic white supremacist who thinks the America's problems can be attributed to a "Jewish supremacy".

If you take a look at his Website, Little also has a flier claiming that he wants to pay African-American descendants of slaves a one-time reparation - go figure.

Don't laugh, as Gomez reported, a SurveyUSA Poll back in May showed Little getting 18% of the Republican vote in California in the race against heavily-favored incumbent Democrat Dianne Feinstein.

Holocaust-denying candidate John Fitzgerald
Would 18% of GOP voters in California have supported a white supremacist who despises Jews as a candidate for the U.S. Senate ten or twenty years ago? MAGA in full effect.

Little isn't alone in California either.

It's been awhile since I've given out a George Lincoln Rockwell Award, so this week's honor has to go to the Republican Congressional candidate for the 11th District of California, John Fitzgerald.

As reporter Julia Jacobs reported for the New York Times on Friday, Fitzgerald won 1/4 of the primary vote for the CA-11th despite dire warnings about the dangers of "Jewish supremacism" posted on his Website, his admiration of Adolph Hitler and his advocating kooky Holocaust denial conspiracy theories as recently as last week.

These kinds of political candidates and the political policies of the Trump administration, along with the kinds of incidents that have taken place in pools and parks across the country recently, reflect darker aspects of American history that took place not that long ago.

And it's not from some distant past, these things are happening now.

Proof positive that the upcoming mid-term elections could be the most important in a generation.

If we hope to learn from history rather than repeat it that is.

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Democrats Sit For Gun Control - Christie's "Fairness Formula" Isn't Fair

House Democrats sit in support of gun control laws
If Republican Congressional leaders thought public demands for stronger gun control laws were simply going to go away after Senate Republicans voted down two different Democratic proposals to strengthen background checks on Monday, they were wrong. 

Last week Senator Murray stood up for 15 hours on the Senate floor for gun control.


At about 11:30am earlier today 36 House Democrats shouted down Republican floor leaders with chants of "No bill, no vote!" then promptly sat down before the podium to protest Republican's refusal to allow gun control measures to be debated or voted on.

The Democrats included Georgia Congressman and civil rights icon John Lewis (pictured above), who endured severe beatings by Alabama State Troopers, hostile crowds and Klansmen on multiple occasions during marches and Freedom Rides during the 1960's in his role as one of the founding members and former chairman of the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).

About 100 Democratic Congressional members eventually joined the sit-in, bringing the House to a halt as chickenshit House Republicans ordered the C-Span cameras and mics that usually cover the Congressional floor sessions shut down - but the sit-ins were carried live via video feeds taken by other Democratic members.

How long are tone-deaf Republicans going to stubbornly stand in opposition to the will of the vast majority of the American people? In a presidential election year no less!

Republicans are up to some legislative shenanigans on the local state level too.

Gov Christie introduces his "Fairness Formula"
Here in New Jersey the word of the week is "Fairness Formula."

That's the term that Republican Governor-Trump apostle Chris Christie has given to a bold new conservative initiative to introduce a draconian redistribution of state aid to New Jersey schools that caps all state aid at $6,599 per pupil regardless of where the schools are located.

Christie announced his proposed changes at Hillsborough High School on Tuesday, saying he plans to introduce it as an amendment to the state constitution.

He's calling it a "budget reallocation formula", but what it really represents is a rather transparent attempt to cut the property taxes of wealthy suburban New Jersey communities by exploiting long-simmering divisions in the Garden State on how public schools are funded.

Sadly the debate falls along socio-economic and racial and ethnic lines and stretches back to 1976 when the state Supreme court actually shut down schools until state legislators came up with tax revenue to adequately fund public schools in 31 low-income school districts in accordance with the state's constitution.

This debate stems from the historic state Superior Court court decision in Abbott v Burke, a case brought back in 1981 by the Education Law Center on behalf of 20 public school students from four of New Jersey's poorest districts; Camden, East Orange, Irvington and Jersey City.

Gaps in language arts proficiency in NJ 2005 - 2001
The case challenged the 1975 Public School Education Act in order to address rampant inequities in the quality of public school education in different districts in New Jersey.

The Abbot v Burke case according to the ELC "is recognized as the most important education litigation for poor and minority school children since Brown v Board of Education."




Through changes in public school funding, more state funds were channeled to NJ's "Abbott schools" to try and address the education gap; those changes were highly controversial, particularly among some residents of the state's wealthiest districts whose much higher tax base created inherent advantages for their district's students.

One of Christie's first initiatives when he was elected Governor was to try and use his office to chip away at the funding formula in an effort to dismantle the court-ordered mandates of the Abbott decisions; he even tried to mess with the make-up of the state Supreme Court.

Christie poses with Camden HS students
As a lame-duck Republican Governor with a record low approval rate, it's not hard to figure out Christie's goal in launching this salvo - he's conscious of his legacy and wants to be "the guy who cut taxes."

His "Fairness Formula" would drastically increase state school funding for 75% of New Jersey school districts, allowing those districts to proportionately lower their property taxes.


But conversely it would introduce draconian cuts to per-pupil state aid to the schools in New Jersey's poorest communities; Christie claims to want "fairness", but how is it fair to cut state aid by 78% in Camden?

State aid in 37 districts would be cut by more than 50% - guess where those districts are located?

"Despicable" is how New Jersey Education Association president Wendell Steinhauer described Christie's proposal, saying, "Governor Christie's proposal would result in a huge step backward to the days when poor families in economically challenged communities were left to fend for themselves."

To get a better sense of how Governor Christie's "Fairness Formula" would impact state funding to New Jersey schools, take a look at the numbers as posted in a chart on the NJ.com Webpage.

Most experts agree Christie's initiative has little chance of passing a Legislature with a Democratic majority, but as an ideological attack, maybe it's a feather in the cap Christie hopes to wear in Washington one day.

From his flipping on issues like gun control and abortion over the course of the 2016 presidential race, to his embrace of Donald Trump, Christie has been steadily trying to remake himself as something far to the right of the man who was twice elected as governor of New Jersey.

With his "Fairness Formula"proposal, which is anything but to students in the states poorest districts, perhaps his political and ideological metamorphosis is complete.

I can't help but wonder, was the popular moderate conservative who was elected governor a Democratic-leaning state an illusion? Or is it the man we see now?